SQL Server 2025 NEWS: Enhanced T-SQL Syntax for Query Modularity
Enhanced T-SQL Syntax for Query Modularity
One of the most interesting directions for SQL Server 2025 is the evolution of T-SQL towards more modular, readable, and composable queries.
The goal is not to replace stored procedures or functions, but to allow developers to structure complex queries into logical blocks, very much like local functions or expressions, while keeping everything inside a single SQL statement.
The Problem: Complex Queries Become Hard to Read
Consider a simple table:
ARTICO (
CODICE INT,
DESCR VARCHAR(100)
)
Even with a small table like ARTICO, real-world queries often grow in complexity:
filters, derived columns, joins, business rules, and conditional logic all accumulate.
Traditionally, we rely on deeply nested subqueries or long WITH chains, which quickly become
hard to read and maintain.
Traditional Approach (Classic CTE)
Using today’s T-SQL, we might write:
WITH ArticoliFiltrati AS (
SELECT CODICE, DESCR
FROM ARTICO
WHERE CODICE > 100
),
ArticoliNormalizzati AS (
SELECT
CODICE,
UPPER(DESCR) AS DESCR
FROM ArticoliFiltrati
)
SELECT *
FROM ArticoliNormalizzati;
This works, but as logic grows, the intent of each step can become blurred.
Enhanced Modular Syntax (SQL Server 2025 Direction)
SQL Server 2025 introduces the concept of named query blocks, allowing us to explicitly define logical units of work inside a query.
Conceptually, the same query could be expressed as:
WITH
DEFINE FilteredArticoli = (
SELECT CODICE, DESCR
FROM ARTICO
WHERE CODICE > 100
),
DEFINE NormalizedArticoli = (
SELECT
CODICE,
UPPER(DESCR) AS DESCR
FROM FilteredArticoli
)
SELECT *
FROM NormalizedArticoli;
Each block has a clear name and a clear responsibility, very similar to local functions in a programming language.
Why This Matters
- Improved readability: each block expresses intent, not just mechanics
- Better maintainability: logic can be modified in isolation
- Fewer nested subqueries: flatter, more understandable SQL
- Closer to declarative programming: describe what, not how
More Advanced Example: Business Logic on ARTICO
Let’s introduce a slightly more realistic scenario:
- Filter valid articles
- Classify them based on the code
- Prepare a final projection for reporting
WITH
DEFINE ValidArticoli = (
SELECT CODICE, DESCR
FROM ARTICO
WHERE DESCR IS NOT NULL
),
DEFINE ClassifiedArticoli = (
SELECT
CODICE,
DESCR,
CASE
WHEN CODICE < 1000 THEN 'STANDARD'
ELSE 'SPECIAL'
END AS CATEGORY
FROM ValidArticoli
)
SELECT CODICE, DESCR, CATEGORY
FROM ClassifiedArticoli;
This query reads almost like a specification: each step refines the data without hiding logic in deeply nested expressions.
Not a New Language – An Evolution of T-SQL
It’s important to stress that this approach does not turn T-SQL into a procedural language.
Instead, it strengthens its declarative nature, making complex data transformations easier to express, review, and reason about.
For developers working on large SQL codebases, this is a major step forward.
Why This Fits Modern SQL Workloads
As SQL Server increasingly intersects with:
- Analytics
- Data science
- AI-driven query optimization
the ability to express logic in a clean, modular way becomes crucial.
Enhanced query modularity is not about syntax sugar — it is about scaling human understanding of SQL.

Comments
Post a Comment