SQL Server, Again info about statistics and the "Ascending Key Problem"

Hi Guys!

Here the post of today i wrote in one go.
So don't care about the punctuation, please.

In the last post we talked about Cardinality Estimation with a short introduction to the statistics.

Before moving forward i would like to tell you some words about how they work and expecially about a problem that can arise with them called the "Ascending Key Problem"

So, are you ready for another deep dive? GO!


Statistics and Automatic update of statistics.

I will try to explain an important concept through the example below.

Suppose to have an already populated table (called listofdata) with statistics up to date.
The structure of our table is:


Create table listofdata (id integer, data datetime, value float)
Create index idx_listodata_data on listofdata(data)


Watching associated statistics for the index we see that we have 1000 rows each with the same value in the field data.


dbcc show_statistics (listofdata, 'idx_listodata_data') WITH HISTOGRAM



Now insert others 1000 rows in the table but with a different value for the field data.
Now observe our statistics again.


IMPORTANT:

What can you observe?  
Well: our new 1000 rows are not inside statistics!

Why? 
Because inserted rows are few enough to not trigger the automatic update of statistics.

This becomes a problem when we search data just inserted.

Look at the execution plan:




Oops! Estimated number of Row is equal to 1 (rather than 1000!)

This is a big problem because if the optimizer didn't know the exact cardinality then it could choose an execution plan not optimal.

For example Optimizer could use an index scan instead of a index seek or viceversa.
This is so called "Ascending Key Problem"

But the question is: why the value 1 is used?
This value is simply a default used when the value we search is not inside the statistics!

P.S. Some traceflag exists to mitigate this problem but we won't talk about it today!

Old Cardinality estimator vs. New Cardinality estimator

What we have seen is related to the old Cardinality estimator use by SQL Server until versione 2012 included.

SQL Server 2014 bring to us the so called New cardinality estimator.

So in order to use the new cardinality estimator you need SQL Server 2014 onward with it's native compatility level.

One thing that New Cardinality estimator bring us is a solution to the "Ascending Key Problem".

How?

Important:

New Cardinality estimator assumes that some rows may exists!
So, to estimate a number of rows of the "all density" value  and multiplies that by the cardinality of the table.

In the picture below you can view che "All density" value. SQL Server simply multiply this value for the rumber of rows of the table.
This lead to a more realistic extimated row number and usually avoid the "Ascending Key Problem"




That's all for today!
I hope you enjoy this post!
See you soon.

Luca Biondi @ SQLServerPerformance blog!





 

 

 

 

Next post: Your biggest customer can’t work! It is stuck due to a SQL Server randomly crash? And now?

Previous Post: Inside the SQL Server Query Optimizer - part 3 Cardinality estimation

Listen a song with my mood of the Day: 13 buone ragioni

Comments

Post a Comment

I Post più popolari

SQL Server, execution plan and the lazy spool (clearly explained)

Image
Hi Guys, Welcome back! In one of the last posts we talked about Table Spool . We had explained what Spool are for by telling the somewhat curious story of the halloween problem . Here we specifically talked about a type of spool called Eager Spool   You can look to the execution plan below where the eager Spool is used to avoid the halloween problem in classic query of the "salary increase".. i suggest Well, if the story of the eager spool intrigued you, today instead we will speak about another type of Spool, the Lazy Spool . The Lazy spool Let's take a small step back. So, what is a Spool operation?  As we have already understood a spool operation is simply a temporary storage of data . Data are read from a source table and stored inside a worktable in the Tempdb database . While an Eager Spool is used to prevent the Halloween problem, the Lazy Spool is instead used to store data that will later be needed again when running a query . So, when a Lazy spool is used?  ...
Read more

SQL Server, datetime vs. datetime2

Image
Hi guys, This time, in this post we will speak about datetime and datetime2 datatypes. We will talk about the pros and cons. We will talk about all the differences between the two types of data. Write me in the comments which type of data do you prefer between the two. Enjoy the reading!     Datetime Vs. Datetime2 First of all, it must be said that the datatype datetime is certainly the best known native format for storing a date in SQL Server. However, Microsoft has also been introducing a new type of data for many years now, also used to manage dates. It is in fact from SQL server 2008 that it is present in datetime2 data type. This "new" type of data was born primarily to have higher accuracy . Let's in fact talk about ... precision ! Datetime Certainly the datetime data type is not very precise and certainly there are many cases in which its precision is simply not sufficient. Let's see it with an example. Open the SQL Management studio (SSMS) and write the fo...
Read more

La clausola NOLOCK. Approfondiamo e facciamo chiarezza!

Image
Ehi ragazzi! La domanda è di quelle importanti! Siete pronti per scoprire tutto ma proprio tutto sulla clausola NOLOCK?   Se la riposta è si, allora seguitemi! Oggi ne spiegheremo il funzionamento in maniera approfondita. Faremo una introduzione al concetto di tipi di LOCK Ed infine vedremo come mai una SELECT ne può bloccare un'altra. Non vi nascondo che il motivo di questo articolo è fare chiarezza. Su questo argomento si sentono spesso affermazioni “curiose” ma tra le tante questa è la prima: “ uso la SELECT con l’opzione WITH(LOCK) così non blocco le altre tabelle ”.   Ma, è proprio vero quanto affermato? Beh oggi facciamo il punto!   Buona lettura!     La clausola NOLOCK Diciamo subito per iniziare che cos’è la NOLOCK. NOLOCK è il nome di una clausola che è possibile specificare all’interno di uno statement di tipo SELECT utilizzando la seguente sintassi: SELECT * FROM TABELLA WITH (NOLOCK) Si noti che non possiamo ...
Read more